21.10.12

Parashat Noach


On the first day of Av (רש''י, בראשית ח:ה, ד''ה בעשירי וגו' נראו ראשי ההרים), the tops of the mountains became visible.  On the first day of Tishrei (רש''י, בראשית ח:יג, ד''ה בראשון). Noach removed the cover of the ark.  These two events occur exactly two months, or fifty-nine days (רש''י, בראשית ז:י''ב, ד''ה ארבעים יום וגו') apart from one another.

The problem is that the Torah relates other events to us that occurred in between, and these other events span at least sixty-one days.


How could Noach see the mountain tops on the first of Av, wait forty days to send the raven, wait seven more days to send the dove, continue sending the dove for fourteen more days, and open the ark’s cover on the first of Tishrei.  The math does not add up.

Perhaps we can crunch these events into a comfortable fifty-nine day span by applying the general rule מקצת היום ככלו, that part of a day may be counted as an entire day.  Several mishnayot in Mesechet Nega’im illustrate one application of this general rule:

עור הבשר . . . מטמא בשני שבועות, שהן שלשה עשר יום.
הבגדים . . . מטמאין בשני שבועות, שהן שלשה עשר יום.
הבתים . . . מטמאין בשלשה שבועות, שהן תשעה עשר יום .
(מסכת נגעים, ג:ג, ז, ח)

A person quarantined with an affliction on his skin, clothing, or house must be quarantined for up to three weeks to determine the status of the affliction, i.e., whether or not the affliction is tzara’as.  The mishna explains that a two‑week quarantine period, which comprises two consecutive seven‑day quarantine periods, lasts not fourteen but thirteen days.  This is because the last day of the first quarantine period counts as the first day of the second quarantine period.  Likewise, a three‑week quarantine, which comprises three seven‑week periods, lasts not twenty‑one but nineteen days since the last day of each of first and second quarantine periods counts as the first day of the second and third quarantine periods, respectively.

Let’s apply the same rule to the events in our parasha.  Three seven‑day periods span the time between Noach’s sending of the raven and Noach’s final sending of the dove.  If we assume that (i) the last day of the first seven‑day period is also the first day of the second seven‑day period and that (ii) the last day of the second seven‑day period is also the first day of the third seven‑day period, then these three seven‑day periods can span nineteen days instead of twenty‑one.

(Note that the last day of the forty‑day period cannot also count as the first day of the first seven‑day period.  This is because the pasuk (8:6) states that Noach opened the window to send the raven “at the conclusion of forty days,” i.e., not until the forty‑first day.  In the other instances, the pasuk only states that Noach waited “seven days,” not that he waited to the conclusion of seven days.)

To recap, Noach sent the raven on the forty‑first day of the fifty‑nine day span.  On the forty‑seventh day, he sent the dove for the first time.  On the fifty‑fourth day, he sent the dove a second time.  Noach sent the dove a third and final time on the fifty‑ninth day, and he waited until the conclusion of that day to see whether the dove would return.  At the conclusion of the fifty‑ninth day, he determined that the dove was not coming back as it had the previous two times.  The next day, the sixtieth day, the first of Tishrei, Noach opened the cover of the ark.


14.10.12

Parashat Beraishis



What was the snake's endgame? Why did it care whether Adam or Chava ate from the tree of knowledge?  Rashi, quoting Chazal, addreses this question:
מאיזו סבה קפץ הנחש עליהם ראה אותם ערומים ועוסקים בתשמיש לעין כל ונתאוה לה
(רש"י, בראשית ג:א)
אתה לא נתכוונת אלא שימות אדם כשיאכל הוא תחלה ותשא את חוה ולא באת לדבר אל חוה תחלה אלא לפי שהנשים דעתן קלות להתפתות ויודעות לפתות את בעליהן לפיכך ואיבה אשית
(רש"י, בראשית ג:טו)
According to Rashi, the snake saw Chava naked and wanted to marry her.  But in order to marry Chava, the snake would first have to kill Adam.  So the snake schemed to kill Adam by having him eat from the tree of knowledge.  Of course, the snake knew that he could not coax Adam into eating from the tree.  Only Chava could do that.  So instead, the snake coaxed Chava, hoping that she in turn would coax Adam.  And after Adam would eat from the tree, the snake would be free to marry Chava.
The snake’s plan is the dumbest plan ever contrived.  Did the snake consider that Chava would also die once she ate from the tree?  With Adam dead and Chava widowed, the snake would be free to marry Chava.  But the snake’s plan would leave both Adam and Chava dead.

This uncovers a fundamental flaw in the snake’s plan.  Let’s break down the flaw, starting by outlining the various goals the snake's plan sought to achieve:
·         The snake began with an overall goal, to marry Chava.  Let’s call this the Primary Goal.
·         In order to achieve its Primary Goal, the snake also had to kill Adam.  Let’s call this the Secondary Goal.
·         In order to achieve the Secondary Goal, the snake had to coax Chava into feeding the fruit of the tree of knowledge to Adam.  Let’s call this the Tertiary Goal.
The snake recognized it was incapable of immediately achieving either the Primary Goal (since Chava was already married) or the Secondary Goal (since Adam could not be coaxed by anyone other than his wife), so it focused on achieving the Tertiary Goal.  But the snake did not realize that the Tertiary Goal undermined the Primary Goal.  By coaxing Chava, she would no longer be alive, and the snake could no longer marry her.
This is what Rashi means by the words “ונתאוה לה,” that the snake desired Chava.  This was not a rational desire.  And the schemes contrived by the snake to fulfill its desires were not rational schemes.  In fact, they were stupid and poorly contrived schemes.
The snake’s Primary Goal was fueled by its desires.  Therefore, as the snake’s desires intensified, the snake’s goals changed.  In the end, Rashi explains that the snake abandoned its plans of marrying Chava for a far baser goal:
כשנתן לה עצה לאכול מן העץ בא עליה
(רש"י, מס' שבת, דף קמו: ד"ה כשבא נחש על חוה)
At some point, the snake gave up on achieving its goal of marrying Chava.  The desire for Chava was just too strong.  Instead, the snake slept with Chava, settling for a quick fulfillment of its desires in lieu of an eternal marriage.
Consider a young man who sees a pretty woman.  The young man starts scheming about how he is going to marry that woman.  Of course, every scheme he contrives is the stupidest scheme ever.  The scheming leads to obsession, not marriage.  The snake is that young man.
In the end, the snake’s schemes lead to the deaths of Adam and Chava.  But it ends the worst for the snake, who is banished to eating dirt and having its skull crushed in by mankind.  That is what the pasuk means when it says והנחש היה ערום מכל, that the snake was most scheming of all.  Scheming has nothing to do with a well planned endgame.  In fact, things always end worst for the schemer.
 ערום מכל ארור מכל
(רש"י, בראשית ג:א)